Home page News
Bishop Irinej of Bačka: No one has a rig…

Bishop Irinej of Bačka: No one has a right to trifle with centuries-old canonical order of the Orthodox Church

Bishop Irinej of Bačka: No one has a right to trifle with centuries-old canonical order of the
Orthodox Church

In late December 2020, Bishop Irinej of Bačka, hierarch of the Serbian Orthodox Church, gave an
interview to Pečat Serbian news magazine, in which he dwelt, in particular, on such topics as the
consequences that the actions of the Patriarch of Constantinople in Ukraine had for the unity of the whole
Orthodoxy and the danger to the conciliarity in the Church coming from Constantinople’s decisions.
Given below are the relevant fragments of the interview.

 –The situation of the Serbian Orthodox Church has historically always been difficult and implied
the overcoming of various hardships and ordeals, both worldly and spiritual. Those who have been
for a long time concerned about the future of Orthodoxy often speak about the introduction of neo-
papism, with the Patriarchate of Constantinople and Patriarch Bartholomew behind it. As for the
schism in Ukraine, the Serbian Orthodox Church took the stance based on the canonical Tradition.
In this regard, the Russian Orthodox Church expressed high appreciation of the principled position
of the Serbian Orthodox Church and Patriarch Irinej of blessed memory. However, the Greek-
speaking Local Churches (albeit not all of them), including the Church of Cyprus, have shared the
position of Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople, which, to say the least, is problematic. How,
in your view, will the events that caused a greatest upheaval in the Orthodox world unfold?

– The problem of neo-papism that you mentioned does exist, I regret to say. The following evolution
occurred: the Patriarchate of Constantinople – the Mother Church for the Serbian Orthodox Church,
which is the fact that we have no right to forget and we never forget – made the anti-canonical intrusion
into the jurisdiction of the Russian Orthodox Church by “rehabilitating” schismatic communities in
Ukraine, but, regrettably, neither put an end to the schism in Ukraine nor mitigated it, deepening and
prolonging it instead. The schisms that until recently existed in the territory of Ukraine have spread to the
whole Orthodox world. The Moscow Patriarchate severed canonical and liturgical communion with the
Patriarchate of Constantinople, as well as with those Primates and bishops of certain Churches who
recognise unrepentant schismatic Yepifany, or, rather, Mr. Dumenko, as the legitimate Metropolitan of
Kiev and autocephalous (!) Primate of the Church in Ukraine, while living and acting there is
Metropolitan Onufry of Kiev and All Ukraine, well-respected and recognised by the Local Orthodox
Churches. Together with him are over a hundred of canonical bishops with more than fifteen thousand
priests and tens of millions of believers. Meanwhile, the unconciliar unilateral recognition of the
schismatic groups caused not only the schism between the Churches, but also divisions and tensions
within the Churches, as is evident from the disputes among bishops and theologians in Greece and

 In the ensuing spiritual and canonical chaos, the Serbian Orthodox Church, as you have rightly said, took
the principled position of unequivocal faithfulness to the centuries-old canonical order of the Orthodox
Church, which no one has a right to trifle with. The fact that certain people interpret this principled
position as an alliance of some against the others is a problem of their conscience and their understanding
of the Church. We are not against anybody, least of all against the glorious and martyred Patriarchate of
Constantinople that in 1219 granted autocephalous status to our Church and saw in Saint Sava a person
worthy of becoming the first autocephalous Archbishop of Serbia. However, we are against the steps
jeopardizing or violating the unity of the Orthodox Church, as well as throwing doubt on the authority of
Orthodoxy in the eyes of the Roman Catholics and non-Orthodox Christians as a whole.
It is difficult to predict how things will unfold, but, basing our reflections on similar precedents from the
history of the Church, we hope that in the foreseeable future this crisis will be overcome. God willing,
may it happen as soon as possible!

 – At the Council of Crete you already pointed out the inadmissibility of the present-day attempts to
create some kind of institution of the “Eastern Pope” in Orthodoxy and even published a text,
criticising this approach. What ecclesiological position, in your view, would nowadays allow
avoiding the temptations of both centralisation and anarchy?

– I could give a rather detailed answer to this short question, lengthy enough for the entire edition of
Pečat magazine. Put together, everything written in this regard would make up not just one book, but
whole volumes. Yet, taking into consideration the available space, I will confine myself to reducing the
topic to its essentials.
What is the substantial difference between the Orthodox and the Roman Catholic ecclesiologies, though
they both recognise the existence of primacy in the Church? The Roman Catholic Church accepts the
primacy of the Bishop of Rome, Pope, as primacy of power, as supreme authority in decision-making
pertaining to the Church as a whole. The Pope practically stands above the council of bishops: even if all
the Roman Catholic bishops would gather together and decide something, the Pope has in principle an
opportunity to put a veto and take a decision at his own discretion. The structure of the Roman Catholic
Church can be visualised as a pyramid. At its bottom are laypeople; above them are priests, above the
priests are bishops, and at the very top is the Pope. Such structure found its expression in the well-known
Latin proverb Roma locuta, causa finita (Rome has spoken. The cause is finished). Truth be told, the
“pyramidal” structure of the Church was considerably eased, albeit not abolished completely, at the
Second Vatican Council (1961–1965). It recognised the authority of the teaching of the Holy Scripture
and Holy Church Fathers which was successively cherished and preserved in Orthodoxy, and that
constituting the Church are the people of God, including all her members without distinction, be it
bishops, priests, monks, or laypeople.

 Unlike the Roman Church, the Orthodox Church does not resemble a pyramid in her structure. Befitting
her would rather be an image of a house, a large dwelling house with great many flats and residents,
wherein everyone has their own specific function. A service of particular importance is carried out by
bishops. Gathered together at the councils, they resolve church-wide issues, and none of the bishops, even
the presiding one, stands above the council. All decisions are taken either unanimously or by a majority of
votes. The presiding hierarch does not have a right of veto and during a vote can be outvoted, but it does
not deprive him of his dignity as the first among bishops. His primacy is not the primacy of authority, but
the primacy of honour. He is primus, but not outside or above the council; he is primus at the council, first
among equals (primus inter pares), and in no way first without equals (primus sine paribus), which for
centuries have been the claims of the Bishop of “Old” Rome, and lately of the Bishop of “New Rome,”
i.e. Constantinople, now Istanbul.

Both these claims are unacceptable for the Orthodox understanding of the nature and structure of the
Church. According to Canon 28 of the Fourth Ecumenical Council, the Bishop of New Rome received the
same “primacy of honour” that the Bishop of Rome enjoyed in the undivided Church back then; but in the
enumeration or in the diptychs he was in the second place after the Bishop of Rome, because the Roman
primacy of honour is ancient and goes back to the apostolic times. The canon does not impute the primacy
of authority to any of them. There is no such notion in church canons. To sum up, the Church is
characterised more by conciliarity than by monarchy. Relations between the first in honour bishop and the
episcopal council, notable for dynamism, are developed in the only possible way determined by Canon 34
of the Holy Apostles: neither primus can take decisions single-handedly, without the council, nor the
council can do it on its own, without the first bishop. Theanthropic balance and harmony characterise not
only the Person of Christ, but also His Body – the Church of God. My modest final answer to your
question is such: for the great historical ark called the Church, conciliarity is the only possible way to pass
between the Scylla of centralisation and the Charybdis of anarchy.

 – Problems of schism have weakened church unity, inflicting a heavy historical strike on Orthodoxy
on a worldwide scale with interference of the foreign, mostly Western countries. Nothing stands in
the way of the new uncanonical independent Churches to appear after the so-called Orthodox
Church of Ukraine has come into being. These processes are threatening the Serbian Orthodox
Church in particular. Can one assume that the threat to the Crna Gora and Primorje Metropolia
has been removed and we can look ahead to the future with peace of mind?

– Under the circumstances the “diplomatic parlance” and euphemisms do not make much good. Certainly,
it would have been better to use more graceful phrases, but they are lost to all sense in face of “bulldozer diplomacy.” I will give you an example. The chairman of the Synod of a leading Orthodox Church, along with the majority of its bishops, clergy, monks and laypersons, had not shown enthusiasm for the
decisions of their Mother-Church – the Patriarchate of Constantinople adopted in connection with the
ecclesiastical crisis in Ukraine, including those already applied through which the crisis was allegedly
being overcome and the unity of Orthodoxy in the country restored. As a matter of fact, it is well-known
that hasty decisions and uncanonical measures had not helped to overcome schism, but exacerbated it and
caused divisions among certain Orthodox Churches and even within them. A long silence of the
authoritative Archbishop followed, and the situation would not have turned around, but Mr. Brownback
has made an entrance on stage. As the United States Ambassador at Large for International Religious
Freedom since 2018, Sam Brownback has been dealing with religious issues in his own and other
countries. After his seven or eight visits to the Archbishop and talks with him, probably about theological
science and the issues of canon law in particular, the position of the Archbishop and the Synod suddenly
took a “Copernican turn.” The result was an immediate formal recognition of the schismatic structure in
Ukraine as a real Church in spite of the opposite opinion of many authoritative canonists and theologians
of this Church!

 Similar scenarios were played out during the meetings of American officials with the Primates and top
representatives of some other Orthodox Churches. Acting on behalf of their really great and powerful
state, the officials openly and publicly interfere into the inner religious and canonical problems of some
Local Orthodox Churches, though such actions run contrary to the spirit and the letter of the US
democratic constitution. I do not want my words be taken as insinuations or unsubstantiated conclusions,
or indulgency to those responsible representatives of the Church who, in my opinion, are monitoring the
dangers and temptations pertaining to church unity with a certain lack of responsibility. I speak only
about what I read, see and hear. I wish, insofar as I am able, to serve the truth sine ira et studio (without
anger and passion).

 As far as the status of our autonomous Archbishopric of Ohrid and our Diocese (or Metropolia) of Crna
Gora and Primorje is concerned, I believe that it will stay as fixed in the Tomos issued by Constantinople
in 1922 and recognized by Pan-Orthodox consensus. We should not forget neither the Job’s patience nor
suffering endured by Archbishop Jovan of Ohrid for the unity of the Church, nor the newly-deceased
Metropolitan Amfilohije’s patience and struggle he had fought for the sake of the Serbian Orthodox
Church and its freedom.

Patriarch wishes Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk happy 55th birthday


Patriarch Kirill greets the participants of the XXVIII annual General Assembly of the Interparliamentary Assembly on Orthodoxy


Patriarch Kirill meets with Islamic religious leaders in Kazan


His Holiness Patriarch Kirill chairs regular session of Russian Orthodox Church’s Holy Synod


His Holiness Patriarch Kirill chairs meeting of Supreme Church Council


Patriarch Kirill congratulates Mr. Naftali Bennett on his election as head of the Government of the State of Israel


Congratulations of His Holiness Patriarch Kirill to Raul Castro Rus on his 90th birthday


Address by His Holiness Patriarch Kirill on the occasion of the 75 th anniversary of Moscow Patriarchate’s Department for External Church Relations


His Holiness Patriarch Kirill meets with speaker of South Korean Parliament


His Holiness Patriarch Kirill meets with episcopate of Orthodox Church of Moldova


Condolences of His Holiness Patriarch Kirill on the death of the Indonesian Christian leader Bishop Soritua Nababan


Paschal Message of Patriarch KIRILL of Moscow and All Russia to the Archpastors, Pastors, Deacons, Monastics and All the Faithful Children of the Russian Orthodox Church


His Holiness Patriarch Kirill meets Serbian minister of foreign affairs


Holy Synod members commemorate Patriarch Irinej of Serbia and late archpastors of Russian Church


Address delivered by His Holiness Patriarch Kirill at the session of the Holy Synod on 13th April 2021


Metropolitan Hilarion: The most important task of the Church is to consolidate our unity


Head of Russia’s MFA Sergey Lavrov’s interview towards DECR chairman Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk’s 55th birthday


Primates of Local Orthodox Churches wished the DECR chairman happy 55th birthday


The premiere of the film “A Hierarch” about Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk to take place on July 24


Patriarch wishes Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk happy 55th birthday


Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk meets with France’s ambassador to Russia


Interreligious Working Group of the Presidential Council for Cooperation with Religious Associations holds its 11th session


Metropolitan Hilarion: The plight of Christians in many countries of the world is tragic


The DECR chairman completes his trip to the USA 


DECR chairman visits Cathedral of St. John the Baptist of Russian Church Outside Russia


DECR chairman meets with Open Doors human rights advocacy organization


Metropolitan Hilarion meets with Russian ambassador to the US


The chairman of the Department of External Church Relations meets with the former US ambassador-at-large for religious freedom and other representatives


DECR chairman speaks in Washington at international summit on religious freedom


Metropolitan Hilarion: An idea of Belarusian Church autocephaly is being promoted to destabilize situation in the country


Metropolitan Hilarion: Holiness is a constant striving to imitate the Lord Jesus Christ


Metropolitan Hilarion: God does not want to condemn, but to save us


Metropolitan Hilarion: The Lord always grants to us the opportunity to display our talents


Metropolitan Hilarion: The Lord has imbued the waters of Jordan with his divine presence to wash away human sins


Metropolitan Hilarion: to repent means to change your way of life


On commemoration day of St. Catherine, Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk officiated at the Church of St. Catherine the Great Martyr In-the-Fields  the representation of the Orthodox Church in America


Metropolitan Hilarion: We can always show compassion for people


Metropolitan Hilarion celebrates on commemoration day of St. Varlaam of Khutyn at the church of ‘Joy to All the Afflicted’ icon of the Mother of God


Metropolitan Hilarion: We should remember that the life of each human being is in the hands of God


Metropolitan Hilarion: For God there is nothing impossible


Metropoplitan Hilarion: The cross which was an instrument of dishonourable execution becomes the symbol of salvation for millions of people


Metropolitan Hilarion: Eucharist is the wedding feast, to which Lord Jesus Christ invites each of us


Metropolitan Hilarion: Faith alone is not enough for salvation


Metropolitan Hilarion: God is willing to give everyone a wonderful gift of faith, but people must be willing to accept it


Metropolitan Hilarion: We should be mindful of the value of human life



Fields marked by * are mandatory required

Send a message
Рус Укр Eng Deu Ελλ Fra Ita Бълг Geo Срп Rom عرب